Facts & figures
37% reduction in UCAS deferrals, 2011 to 2012 entry
'In 2010/2011 the introduction of higher tuition fees had a significant impact on gap year decisions for those at school in Year 13. Should they go straight to university in 2011 and miss a gap year, or take a gap year and face tuition fees of up to £9,000 per year in 2012?
Data obtained by www.gapadvice.org as at 30 June 2011 shows that ‘’there has been a 37% reduction in applications requesting a deferral of their university place from 2011 to 2012 entry’’.
So a huge number of students opted out of a gap year, arguably a missed opportunity for them and certainly a blow to gap year organisations. It is hoped that next year normality will return to the gap year deferral rate, which (as part of the UCAS application process) has been running at a consistent level of about 7% per year for at least 10 years.
The decision to take a properly structured gap year has considerable merit in its own right, not least in terms of personal development, university performance and career aspiration. This decision can and should be considered separately to the issue of higher tuition fees.'
Phil Murray
Director, www.gapadvice.org
21 July 2011
General
It is estimated by the NatWest (see NatWest press release 12 Oct 07) that in total 24% (93,813) of students took a pre-university gap year for 2006, deferred to 2007. This would include those who applied to HE after their results, as well as those who asked for a deferral, having been given a place at HE. The figure of 24% ties in with a generally accepted view, albeit not proven. The official UCAS figures for those who deferred are below.
UCAS figures (does not include those who will apply/re-apply to HE after their results):
see www.ucas.ac.uk
For 2010, deferred to 2011
- 6.9% of accepted applicants deferred a year (33,426 of 487,329)
For 2009, deferred to 2010
- 7.1% of accepted applicants deferred a year (34,049 of 481,854)
For 2008, deferred to 2009
- 7.3% of accepted applicants deferred a year (33,171 of 456,627)
For 2007, deferred to 2008
- 7.0% of accepted applicants deferred a year (28,863 of 413,430)
For 2006, deferred to 2007
- 7.3% of accepted applicants deferred a year (28,524 of 390,890)
For 2005, deferred to 2006
- 7.7% of accepted applicants deferred a year (31,059 of 405,369)
For 2004, deferred to 2005
- 7.5% of accepted applicants deferred a year (28,435 of 377,544)
For 2003, deferred to 2004
- 7.6% of accepted applicants deferred a year (28,727 of 374,307)
For 2002, deferred to 2003
- 7.9% of accepted applicants deferred a year (29,139 of 368,115)
The 'Review of Gap Year Provision' report
(29 Jul 04) was commissioned by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) and was carried out by Dr Andrew Jones from Birkbeck, University of London, to provide an overview of the policy issues surrounding gap years taken by 16-25 year olds in the UK.
Key Findings:
- A gap 'year' is defined as a period of time between 3 and 24 months which an individual takes 'out' of formal education, training or the workplace where that time sits in the context of a longer term career trajectory.
- The term 'gap year' covers a large range of activities which are best categorised around the 'break point' at which a young person undertakes one. Most young people participate in more than one kind of activity.
- Between 200,000 and 250,000 young people aged 16-25 are estimated to take a gap year of some kind each year, although this figure needs to be treated with caution. Participation is rising year-on-year.
- More and more young people from diverse backgrounds are undertaking gap years; it is becoming less the preserve of affluent middle class and private-school educated young people.
- Planned and well structured gap years are a highly beneficial experience for young people. They are often important factors in facilitating the next step in education or employment. Participants gain a wide range of life skills and other more specialised skills. These skills are often the ones employers identify as lacking in new recruits and are valued by universities. Gap year participation also benefits wider society both in terms of the activities young people undertake and the wider impact of facilitating the integration of young people into society as functioning citizens.
- Young people are motivated to take a gap year for a wide range of factors with the influence of school, universities, friends and family being important. However, the desire for a break from education, work or training is an important underlying motivation.
- There has been a considerable improvement in young people's access to information on gap year opportunities over the last decade.
- Most young people fund their gap year through a variety of sources to support them: paid work, savings and sponsorship are as, if not more, important than parental support.
- There are a very large number of gap year providing organisations based in the UK offering sufficient opportunities for current levels of demand. Most of these organisations are small, offering less than 1000 places per annum.
- The gap year providing sector already has developed some quality assurance procedures and the sector is working hard to develop better mechanisms.
- A number of gap year participant accreditation schemes exist around specific types of activity placements and the review suggests that there is further scope for accreditation scheme development in the sector. However, an overall gap year accreditation scheme would not be appropriate because of the diverse nature of activities that are undertaken.
Additional information
Placement Search
Next Events
24th Feb 2012
Reed's School gap year fair
7th Mar 2012
The LVS school gap year fair
16th Mar 2012
Hurstpierpoint College gap year fair
News
Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Links | About Us | Contact Us





